80% of the world’s evangelical Christians live in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Over the last 50 years, God’s church has grown exponentially in these areas.

These regions have tremendous mission sending potential to help bring the gospel to unreached peoples, but they currently send only 20% of the world’s cross-cultural missionaries!

Articles

Authors

Schedule

Give to Teams or Projects

Your partnership will help us reach the nations through the nations.

Partner with our staff

Give to a Training

We are always on the lookout for ambitious and talented people to come and join Via. If you are passionate about the bringing God's glory to the nations and want to help mobilize the global church then we would love to hear from you.

Open Roles

Careers & Internships

Total Number of Evangelicals

Cultural Bridges to UPGs

Regional Access to UPGs

Religious Freedom

Prosperity

Current Sending Abroad

Mobilization Potential

Custom Mobilization Potential

Number of Evangelicals

Cultural Bridges

Strategic Access

Religious Freedoms

Current Sending

This infographic provides a visual score for seven data points ranked on a 0 to 100 scale. Faded icons show scores for other countries on the mobilization index. See below for actual scores and country-specific insights.

ADDITION

FINANCIAL DEPENDENCY

INACCESSIBLE

LIMITED MISSION FORCE

DISTANT AND FOREIGN MISSION FIELD

THE WORLD IS THE MISSION FIELD

Show Notes

Formats

Available Languages

About the Author

Filter

Tools

Search

Team Profile

In March 2003 sportswriters for USA Today rated the most difficult thing to do in all of sports is to hit a fastball coming toward you at 100 mph. Any major leaguer knows it requires laser like focus to connect with the tiny blur hurling toward them. Similarly, a successful support raiser must exercise incredible concentration if they are going to get to their ministry assignment quickly&mdash;and fully funded. In Bill Dillon&rsquo;s book, People Raising, he contrasts two different, but true, cases of support raising&mdash;one focused on churches, the other on individuals:

<ul>
<li>Support raising training: None</li>
<li>Raised support full time</li>
<li>Churches contacted: 164 (called, info packets sent)</li>
<li>Church meetings: 51</li>
<li>Number of supporting churches: 16</li>
<li>Miles driven: 33,000</li>
<li>Travel expenses: $8,530</li>
<li>Time to get to 100%: 13 months</li>
</ul>

Case #2: Single Girl Focused on Individuals

<ul>
<li>Support raising training: 1 day</li>
<li>Raised support part time (had 40 hr week job)</li>
<li>106 initial letters sent to individuals</li>
<li>41 people called for appointments</li>
<li>38 appointments</li>
<li>31 pledged support</li>
<li>14 others called her to pledge, from word of mouth</li>
<li>Time to get to 100%: 10 weeks</li>
</ul>
I know this is just two cases, but I have seen this played out many times. I believe you should ask your home church to anchor your support team for at least 20% of your total&mdash;and if you have time, approach a few other key churches. But, if possible, the main focus of your support raising should be on individuals. Some denominations like their missionaries to go from church to church to raise support because it builds vision in those congregations, but the wear and tear on that traveling missionary can be substantial. Going to people you do know will almost always bear more fruit than going to churches you don&rsquo;t know. Here&rsquo;s why:
<ol>
<li>The church approach usually takes longer&mdash;Even if you find churches who will meet with you, it takes a lot of time to work through the maze of church committees and policies. </li>
<li>Individuals are more personal&mdash;If a church comes on your team there is usually no one person that has a heart for tracking with you. You want to have a personal, involved team of people to support you, not just organizations who send a check. </li>
<li>Church leaders come and go&mdash;I&rsquo;ve been a pastor and elder in my local churches. Turnover seems like a constant for many churches and if a new pastor or missions committee chairman comes in that doesn&rsquo;t know you, your support may be at risk. </li>
<li>Church support usually goes to their own&mdash;The last 15 years churches have been funneling more and more of their mission dollars towards launching their own members into ministry rather than doling out money to the revolving door of missionaries constantly passing through.</li>
</ol>
Churches or individuals. Which will you focus on? Choose wisely&hellip;

Via Generosity

Churches or Individuals: Which Should You Focus On?

Churches or Individuals: Which Should You Focus On?

In This Article

Steve Shadrach

Related Articles

Seeing Ministry Partners As People–or Targets?

It's Time to Get Personal

My Support Raising Journey: All for God's Purposes